Comments on: Rumored USMNT World Cup 2010 Shirts

By: Porfirio Lepre

Porfirio Lepre — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 03:16:06 +0000

I actually wanted to make a remark to be able to thank you for those precious facts you are writing at this website. My incredibly long internet lookup has at the end of the day been honored with reputable facts to share with my contacts. I would assume that we site visitors actually are definitely endowed to be in a decent community with very many wonderful individuals with good hints. I feel extremely privileged to have discovered the web pages and look forward to tons of more awesome moments reading here. Thanks once more for everything.

By: Andrew

Andrew — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:01:28 +0000

I, for one, am glad the US has changed it’s jerseys because we have a history of truly atrocious jerseys (see ’94, the blue and stars AND the wavy lines, ’98. ’02 was OK, and ’06 was probably the best of the previous bunch). So we are getting better and I think this design is a vast improvement. That being said, I do like the red jersey w/ blue stripe a bit better, but I think the blue one looks good, too. The one major change I would like to see would be with the white uniform. I think it would look a lot sharper with a red stripe, making a LOT more similar to the 1950s jersey. I also think the crest and Nike swoosh should be switched, with the crest a bit smaller (well, both a bit smaller) than it is now. That way, the crest has a prominent position, in the middle of the sash, not Nike (although I suppose it could be argued that Nike is more of a crest of the US anyways).

Again, at the end of the day, I do like it, and I disagree with the notion that the black jerseys were better, as black has no prominence in the US flag or history (the Dutch wear Royal orange as a tribute to their history, not so much to the little bit of orange in their flag). Keep it red, white, and blue.

By: Althea Lundquist

Althea Lundquist — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:41:01 +0000

These jerseys are a let down from the current kits. The sash is ugly. They would be better as just solid colors with an updated badge, including an eagle perhaps.

By: Dan

Dan — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:08:25 +0000

These are alright. I would like the blue one more if it were a darker blue with a red sash, and maybe the white jersey with a blue sash…

By: Glenn

Glenn — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:00:10 +0000

I don’t like the sash, and I agree strongly with the comments about the US having ONE JERSEY and sticking with it. I just hope it isn’t this one.

By: Futbol_Rulz

Futbol_Rulz — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:34:26 +0000

When can we see/order these jerseys? I’f like to get one for Christmas.

By: Jdub

Jdub — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:07:30 +0000

Didn’t see the earlier posts sorry

By: Jdub

Jdub — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:04:09 +0000

Anyone see a resemblance to those and the ones the US wore in 1950 in the historic victory over England in Brazil. Coincidence?

By: Chris Conant

Chris Conant — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:18:40 +0000

If the National Team stands-out, then the jersey succeeds.

Many fans complain about the inconsistency of the colors and of the arrangement to the uniforms. I argue that this is a strength.

The idea of change appeals more than the idea of tradition. How much tradition is there, to a team that did not qualify for forty years? The only tradition to which the US should adhere, is to include a star, for each World Cup won.

By: Idahosa

Idahosa — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:59:08 +0000

i like these because it looks good and the style actually has history i like the blue and red the best tho and just put in 1950 usa national soccer team and ull know the slash is historic that was the jersey that was worn when the USA beat england in the world cup FINALLY jerseys with history connected to it i say we keep em and people should buy em cause i would and yea i wouldnt mind seeing the USA wear red but watever happened to that blue with the white thin strips used for the copa america THOSE WERE AWESOME